Sunday, February 14, 2010


To love is always a decision. A decision made out of pure
If man wanted to pour eternity into himself, he would first have to
deny himself and free the ego from it's own circle of perception.
Man must break the circle the limited self. The small cipher or
Lu=small,primitive Sumerian, cipher=circle. He must liberate himself
from the perception of himself. Perception is based on concepts that
we use to define our existence to secure the ego in what we call
Take for example the idea of being close. From an academic view, we
are as close as we perceive the self is away from that which is being
viewed, but once we remove our self from the concept then close can
not exist.
In other words, the common factor in perception is the presence of the
ego,thereby exposing it's limitation.
When experiencing love, distance, time,and space do not exist.
The reason is that the ego has been subdued,thus timelessness and
space can be shrunk by a thought. We are then able to experience in
the stillness of our selves the person or thing that we have feeling
for and time and space in that moment has been folded.
This principle or concept has it's quantum scientific correspondence
as well.
The strong force in the nucleus of the atom is responsible
for the composite bodies of the atom forming the atom itself. The atom
as we well know, is not a solid body. It is composed of 3 bodies;
proton, neutron, and electron. There was an agreement that was made
between these 3 bodies to harmoniously begin their rotations. They e-
lected or chose a path of rotation. Thus, we have the elect-tron. A
body that chooses or elects its travel pattern or tron. The proton
chooses its pattern as well and the neutral body that maintains
stillness , the nucleus;and by doing so creating it's own twin tron,
or movement.
The principle of correspondence would lend itself to begin to
understand human behavior from the atomic structure prototype in this
In a harmonious relationship between male and female bodies, the
agreement must be made between the two involved to experience the path
or they must elect, to revolve around the relationship and not be
attracted to the mass of their own bodies. In other words in a
relationship of love, the people involved are fed from the neutrality
of both parties having a vested interest in the other. This interest
is what forms a bond. These two bodies can not lose sight of the
neutrality because it (neutrality) has or is the composite of the
equal balance between the two thereby keeping both bodies whole and
It is only when we are attracted to our own interest, our own mass
that we lose our way or elected path and then disrupt the sacred
balance of opposite elected bodies and we are cast out into space
spinning with no purpose. All we seek at that point is to bond again
and agree to select another path and begin the process all over again.
Nuwaupu is neutrality and we are the bodies that have elected our
paths to revolve around it and maintain the balance and order.
We have cast off our mass only to experience timelessness as we are,
matterless as we are, spacelessness as we are.
As atoms are the building blocks of all structure and bodies, then the
composites must follow the successful examples of harmonious
in nature. That is the only way to be successful in
relationships of love and any other relationship that we may find
ourselves in. We must understand what the attraction is. Then we will
agree upon why we have taken this tron or path. We then have to agree
to revolve around the relationship, and not get weighed down by our
own interest that have nothing to do with the mutual agreement.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010


Psychic self defense is a term that is used to describe how to counter a persons attack on your mind which ultimately will affect your actions or what you do.
It is necessary to defend yourself psychicly because we are constantly under attack and being influenced by many things that can impact our spiritual growth and development.
We are constantly under attack from the media, we are too fat, too short, too small, we have bad teeth, bad breath and we are basically made to feel inadequate on a regular basis and made to feel as though we are not meeting some invisible idea of acceptance. This is an example of a psychic attack.
To defend yourself against a psychic attack is to accept yourself and all the greatness of yourself and then to also accept that which you think is inadequate as well. Learn to accept and embrace the things about you that you may not like and that you may want to change. See these things as that which makes you unique and there will be no reason to fear what you don't like about yourself because there is nothing that is wrong with you. You are made perfect in every way. This understanding is one of the first steps in beginning to defend yourself against psychic influence because you will be at peace when you accept yourself and love yourself and your flaws it is harder to penetrate you with negative influences because there is an inner strength that will close off attacks because you are emotionally and mentally weak.
A joyful person is harder to attack because they are strong in spirit and mind. The weak emotion of dissatisfaction and self hate are easy to penetrate because they are weak emotions. It is easier to influence a person in this state because these emotions create openings for influences to come in and make you think that you are in control when you are not.
The physical manifestation of a person losing the battle in psychic self defense can show up in several different ways.
Some people turn to drugs to fill a void in themselves that can be placed there by weak feelings of inadequate feelings. Feeling like you dont quite measure up to the standard and we use these kind of drugs to "fill" the void that we have.
Most may have been expecting a more deep explanation than the one given and there is, but the point of this lecture at this point is to give practical useful information from these blogs.
It is the intention of the writer to inspire the readers to research and ask questions.

Friday, February 5, 2010


Im glad that you asked that question. Thank you.To answer your first question, the way that you get rid of the God archetype is to realize that God is not necessary in pheonomena. In other words you can go with out God but you cant go with out the sun, air, water and earth.These are all natural and natures sustanence for us all. You can live your life and never know that there was a God that existed and still be alive. If the sun were to suddenly stop shining, then we would be dead and then the existence of God does not matter. All we want is for the sun to come back so that we can continue to live. Also God does everything through nature. The greatest examples of Gods power is all through nature. For instance, God talked to Moses through a burning bush. Here you have the element of fire, and then a bush, both are parts of nature. Then you have the parting of the Red or Reed sea, that was water that he used to drown the pharoahs army, again, water; a natural element. The only proof of any of those stories being real is the existence of the elements of nature in them. Thats how we get sucked in. We have no proof in any walls in Egipt that there ever was a Moses. There is no proof that fire can consume a bush in flames yet not burn it. There is no proof that the sea has ever split itself down the middle, or be selective about how it drowns. There is proof though that water exists, there is proof that fire exists.These stories have got to have some tie into NATURAL existence as foundation so that the person that is playing the God game or writing the book has a winning chance to suck you in and win over your mind with those stories.They can say, "Look here is Mt Zion where Moses stood." Then if you ask them."Well light a bush on fire and if it is not consumed by the fire, and a voice comes from it, then I'll belive ya story." But there are bodies of water all over the world, with different names how come the sea that was parted then is not parted still now? These would be unnessary acts of the power of God if they really did occur which makes God not needed. As for the second question, the beginning is everything that is in reference to the perspective of the author of the Bible and not an omnipotent God. So what ended before the existence of the God model was the perspective of reality without the need for a God to explain his existence to man so that man feels important. Hotep